|
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
|
|
Orders Pronounced November 13, 2026
|
| |
|
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
|
|
26-1168
|
JOE LOUIS ROBINSON v. NORTH MILL EQUIPMENT FINANCE LLC, AS GRANTOR, BENEFICIARY AND SERVICER OF NORTH MILL CREDIT TRUST F/K/A EFS CREDIT TRUST; from Tarrant County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-25-00628-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-20-26)
|
| |
|
26-1170
|
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF STEVEN O. STEELE AND RACHEL L. STEELE; from Hopkins County; 6th Court of Appeals District (06-25-00133-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-19-26)
|
| |
|
26-1178
|
IN THE INTEREST OF J.M. AND L.J., CHILDREN; from Tarrant County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-26-00363-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 09-03-26)
|
| |
motion to withdraw as counsel granted
|
| |
|
26-1180
|
JAMES HALE v. LANESBOROUGH CORPORATION AND TEXAS SFI PARTNERSHIP 24, LTD.; from Harris County; 1st Court of Appeals District (01-24-00976-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-27-26)
|
|
ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
|
|
THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
|
|
26-0673
|
IN THE INTEREST OF D.D.D.-H. A/K/A D.D.D.H., A.R.M., AND O.N.H. A/K/A O.H., CHILDREN; from Harris County; 1st Court of Appeals District (01-25-00917-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-28-26)
|
| |
|
26-0692
|
KAREY B. STATIN v. NORTH HARRIS COUNTY REGIONAL AUTHORITY, HARRIS COUNTY W.C.I.D. NO. 109, BOARD OF DIRECTORS HARRIS COUNTY W.C.I.D. NO. 109, EDP WATER UTILITIES SERVICES, AND INFRAMARK; from Harris County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-25-00385-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-14-26)
|
| |
|
26-0738
|
FRANK LUCIO v. RACHEL ARMENDAREZ; from Tarrant County; 11th Court of Appeals District (11-24-00125-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-18-25)
|
| |
|
26-0815
|
SWARN L. GROVER v. PLANO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; from Collin County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-25-01572-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-18-26)
|
| |
|
26-0828
|
REZA BADIEE v. SAEED MAHBOUBI, INDIVIDUALLY, MOHAMMAD RAHEEL ZAFAR, INDIVIDUALLY, MUNIR AHMAD, INDIVIDUALLY, BMH AS-BUILT USA OF TEXAS, INC., LAMAR SCHOOL RESIDENCES, LLC., ET AL.; from Collin County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-25-00334-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-13-26)
|
| |
motion for leave to file supplement dismissed as moot
|
| |
|
26-0881
|
IN THE INTEREST OF B.J.M., A CHILD; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-25-00382-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-27-26)
|
| |
|
26-0905
|
TING JIANG v. MICHAEL GLENN DAWSON; from Fort Bend County; 1st Court of Appeals District (01-24-00056-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-28-26)
|
| |
|
26-0943
|
TAMMY BROWN v. THE STAR OF HOPE MISSION; from Harris County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-26-00657-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-25-26)
|
|
THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:
|
|
26-0838
|
IN RE ANU OTARO IRUUPA; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-26-01069-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-03-26)
|
| |
|
26-0971
|
IN RE SHONTAINE BROWN; from Denton County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-26-00570-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-27-26)
|
| |
as supplemented
motion to supplement mandamus record granted
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:
|
|
26-1092
|
IN RE TIMOTHY LEE BARNUM
|
| |
|
26-1293
|
IN RE TARRANT COUNTY LIBERTARIAN PARTY AND SEAN SPARKMAN, IN HIS CAPACITY AS COUNTY CHAIR OF THE TARRANT COUNTY LIBERTARIAN PARTY; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-26-00725-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 11-03-26)
|
| |
relators' emergency motion for temporary relief denied
relators' motion for leave to lodge video exhibits granted
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED:
|
|
26-1154
|
IN RE HANS DANE CHRISTIAN TRUELSON; from Harris County; 1st Court of Appeals District (01-26-00955-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-06-26)
|
|
A STAY IS ISSUED IN THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS:
|
|
26-1268
|
IN RE THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD; from Harris County; 1st Court of Appeals District (01-26-00634-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-02-26)
|
| |
relator's motion for temporary relief and stay granted
stay order issued
|
| |
[Note: The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.]
|
